Tag: court

Our newest bike, the AC Performance Plus with Carbon Blue, is designed to enhance rider comfort with an infinitely adjustable seat and handlebars, a wider step-through and durable, covered stretch pads – all surrounded by a rust-free aluminum frame. A stronger drive train and carbon blue belt make for easy maintenance while delivering an authentic… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

But in terms of U.S. employment, “it’s really a shadow of what it used to be.” From California, the bikes fan out to mass merchants such as Wal-Mart. Once there, cashiers making less than $10 an hour ring up the latest Sting Ray at prices much cheaper than the original. Pacific sells more than a… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

The Varsity and Continental sold in large numbers through the 1960s and early 1970s, becoming Scwhinn’s leading models. The wheel rims were likewise robust, chromed, stamped steel with a unique profile designed to hold the tire bead securely, even if pressure were low or lost. After huffy mountain bike a series of production cuts and… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

In the absence of price-fixing and with an adequate source of alternative products to meet the needs of the unfranchised, the vertically imposed distribution restraints may not be held to be per se violations of the Sherman Act. In 1977, the partners managed to secure an order from the great American bicycle company,Schwinn. When Giant’s… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

The serial number appears in different places on the bike depending on the year and the place the bike was made. Not all vintage Schwinns have serial numbers or follow a set convention for placement and numbering. If there is huffy mountain bike a serial number, it will always appear on the actual frame of… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

Interestingly, Schwinn’s 1970’s catalogs didn’t really differentiate the fillet-brazed CrMo models either. They were simply shown on the next catalog page, right before the Continental page. No separate catalog or distinct section for “lightweight touring and racing bicycles,” and no detailed discussion of the benefits of seamless CrMo tubing and fillet brazing. Schwinn’s catalog copy… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

We provide valuable and informative articles to help guide you on your purchases by partnering with knowledgeable cyclists and reliable bike stores and brands that sell their products online. They offer various models to serve their wide clientele while still meeting different needs, the models include mountain, electric, cruisers, road, comfort/bike path, urban, and kids… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center